Many commercial plans require prior authorization after a set number of visits or for specific modality codes. When front-desk staff aren’t tracking visit counts against authorization thresholds, the claim hits the payer without approval on file and gets denied automatically. This type of denial is entirely avoidable. Build internal triggers well before the authorized limit, for example, when roughly 70, 90% of approved visits have been used, so your team has time to request continuation before the patient crosses the threshold. Every authorization number needs to be documented and linked to the claim before submission.
Credentialing lapses are particularly damaging because they disguise themselves as coverage problems. An expired contract, an NPI mismatch, or a missed re-credentialing submission causes the payer to process the claim at out-of-network rates or deny it outright. By the time you identify the root cause, you may have submitted several cycles of claims under the wrong status. Audit your credentialing status with each payer annually, and when you discover a lapse mid-billing cycle, contact the payer immediately to understand the retroactive correction process.
Annual visit caps and maintenance care exclusions are a different category entirely. A claim denied because the patient hit their visit limit is not an appeal opportunity, it’s a verification failure that happened on day one. Knowing the patient’s benefit structure before the first visit, including the cap, the copay structure, and what their plan specifically covers for manipulation, sets accurate financial expectations and prevents this category of denial from happening at all.
Read the Full Article to Learn More!
Not an H.J. Ross Company Platinum Network member? Click here!
